🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," said the MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various figures to follow this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of this nation and others indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.